Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.
Cell fate map can show quality of cells. The phrase “there is more than one way to skin a cat” fits much of science. It is quite true for using stem cell science to generate a needed type of adult cell to repair damaged tissue. The most traditional way, directing early stem cells, the ones called pluripotent, to mature into the desired tissue is often cumbersome and has the potential of leaving behind a few of those early cells that could cause a tumor. More recently, many teams have been starting with one type of adult tissue and reprogramming them to directly convert into a different adult tissue without passing through that potentially tumor causing state. But we have not had a good way to measure which route produces the higher quality cells—which one yield cells most like those in our body.
Many in the field had hoped that the direct conversion of adult cells to other cell types would prove to be the way to go. Unfortunately, the computer program showed that those cells were not nearly as good at mimicking natural cells as cells matured from early stem cells were. However, the team suggests their system points to ways to improve direct conversion. The researchers published two paper on the system they are calling CellNet in the journal Cell August 14 and Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News did a nice write up of the work.
Willie Nelson advances stem cells for muscular dystrophy. Really! No, Willie is not in the lab, but he was named an honorary member of the lab and had an endowed chair held by the lab director named for him. He had performed at a concert to raise money to fund the work at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and the university decided to honor him with the named chair.
In the current paper the lab used the most trendy form of gene modification out there right now, called CRISPR. Researchers are excited about the technology because it can specifically go into our DNA and permanently cut out a mutation. Then our natural genetic machinery can go about making the correct gene. In this case they used it to cut out the error that caused Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a mouse model. After the correction, the mice grew new muscle and got stronger.
The CRISPR technology needs some refinements before it would be ready for use in humans, but the team is working on that along with many others around the country. Their goal: correct the error in patient muscle stem cells so that they can produce a lifetime supply of healthy muscle. The journal Science published their work online August 14 and the HealthCanal website picked up the university press release.
Scientists need to talk to the public. The director of the National Institutes of Health, Francis Collins, visited the University of Washington this week and delivered a message straight from my personal soapbox: Funding for research is in jeopardy and the only way it will be salvaged is for researchers to get more involved in outreach to the public. The Seattle Times quoted him as saying:
“I think it’s at a particularly crucial juncture. If there was a moment to kind of raise consciousness, this is kind of the moment to do that.”
He noted that the chances of a research proposal submitted to NIH getting funded dropped from 40 percent in 1979 to 16 percent now, saying “we’re leaving half the good science on the table.” Part of the solution he suggested was for scientists to get out to Rotary clubs, high school classrooms, and any other public speaking opportunity.
“It seems to me that we all have to spend more of our time, perhaps, as ambassadors for science literacy — trying to explain what we do and why it matters.”