Media shine a spotlight on dodgy stem cell clinics

A doctor collects fat from a patient’’s back as part of an experimental stem cell procedure in Beverly Hills, Calif. on Dec. 5, 2014. (Raquel Maria Dillon / Associated Press)

For several years now, we have been trying to raise awareness about the risks posed by clinics offering unproven or unapproved stem cell therapies. At times it felt as if we were yelling into the wind, that few people were listening. But that’s slowly changing. A growing number of TV stations and newspapers are picking up the message and warning their readers and viewers. It’s a warning that is getting national exposure.

Why are we concerned about these clinics? Well, they claim their therapies, which usually involve the patient’s own fat or blood cells, can cure everything from arthritis to Alzheimer’s. However, they offer no scientific proof, have no studies to back up their claims and charge patients thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars.

In the LA Times, for example, reporter Usha Lee McFarling, wrote an article headline “California has gone crazy for sketchy stem cell treatments”. In it she writes about the claims made by these clinics and the dangers they pose:

“If it sounds too good to be true, it is. There is no good scientific evidence the pricey treatments work, and there is growing evidence that some are dangerous, causing blindness, tumors and paralysis. Medical associations, the federal government and even Consumer Reports have all issued stern warnings to patients about the clinics.”

In Denver, the ABC TV station recently did an in-depth interview with a local doctor who is trying to get Colorado state legislators to take legal action against stem cell clinics making these kinds of unsupported claims.

Chris Centeno of the Centeno-Schultz Clinic, who’s specialized in regenerative medicine and research for more than a decade, said too many people are simply being scammed.

“It’s really out of control,” he told the station.

ABC7 did a series of reports last year on the problem and that may be prompting this push for a law warning consumers about the dangers posed by these unregulated treatments which are advertised heavily online, on TV and in print.

In California there is already one law on the books attempting to warn consumers about these clinics. CIRM worked with State Senator Ed Hernandez to get that passed (you can read about that here) and we are continuing to support even stronger measures.

And the NBC TV station in San Diego recently reported on the rise of stem cell clinics around the US, a story that was picked up by the networks and run on the NBC Today Show.

One of the critical elements in helping raise awareness about the issue has been the work done by Paul Knoepfler and Leigh Turner in identifying how many of these clinics there are around the US. Their report, published in the journal Cell Stem Cell, was the first to show how big the problem is. It attracted national attention and triggered many of the reports that followed.

It is clear momentum is building and we hope to build on that even further. Obviously, the best solution would be to have the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) crack down on these clinics, and in some cases they have. But the FDA lacks the manpower to tackle all of them.

That’s where the role of the media is so important. By doing stories like these and raising awareness about the risks these clinics pose they can hopefully help many patients avoid treatments that will do little except make a dent in their pocket.

The Sad Lane: How I navigated one of the happiest times of my life while my mom was losing hers to Alzheimer’s

In 1983 President Ronald Reagan named November as Alzheimer’s Awareness month, to raise awareness about the growing impact the disease was having on Americans. At the time there were less than two million people with the disease. Today that number has grown to more than five million and is expected to reach 16 million by the year 2050. There is no cure and no effective treatments.

To mark Alzheimer’s Awareness month we are reprinting an article that CIRM Board member and Patient Advocate for Alzheimer’s, Lauren Miller, wrote for Lenny magazine, charting her own personal journey with the disease.

The Sad Lane

Stem Cell Roundup: Clinical Trial on the Horizon for Parkinson’s Disease, New Probe Targets Tricky Cancer Cells – Rare Brain Disease May Be Key to Alzheimer’s Insights

Stem Cell Image of the Week: This week’s image shows dopamine producing brain cells. These are the cells that are depleted in people with Parkinson’s Disease.

Unknown

Photo courtesy of B. Bick, . Poindexter, UT Med. School/SPL

Parkinson’s disease news: a new clinical trial, a new face of the disease  (Kevin McCormack)

In his long and illustrious career Alan Alda has worn many hats. First as the star of the hit TV show “M*A*S*H” (the season finale of that is still the most watched TV show ever), then as a writer, director and movie star and, more recently, as the face of popular science and science communications. This week Alda revealed that he has Parkinson’s disease (PD).

In a post on Twitter he said:

“I have decided to let people know I have Parkinson’s to encourage others to take action. I was Diagnosed 3 and a half years ago, but my life is full. I act, I give talks, I do my podcast, which I love. If you get a diagnosis, keep moving!”

CIRM Board member David Higgins echoed those sentiments in an interview on KUSI TV News, San Diego. Dr. Higgins is the patient advocate member for Parkinson’s on the Board, and was diagnosed with PD in 2011, he says being active physically and intellectually are important in helping cope with PD and leading a normal life.

There was also some encouraging news about PD on the research front. Scientists in Japan are about to start a clinical trial using iPSCs to treat people with PD. The cells are created by taking blood stem cells from healthy donors and turning them into dopaminergic progenitors, precursors to the kind of cell destroyed by PD. The cells will then be transplanted into the brains of seven patients with PD.

The researchers, from Kyoto University, say previous studies show the cells could survive in monkeys for up to two years and help improve symptoms of Parkinson’s disease in the primates.

New Molecular Probe Targets Elusive Cancer Stem Cells in Mice (Adonica Shaw)

180802 cancer cells

A group of researchers at the University of Illinois made an advance in how we treat cancer patients this week. In a paper, published in the journal ACS Central Science, the researchers described a new and more effective way of identifying cancer stem cells in cultures of multiple human cancer cell lines as well as in live mice.

After a primary tumor is treated, cancer stem cells may still lurk in the body, ready to metastasize and cause a recurrence of the cancer in a form that’s more aggressive and resistant to treatment. The researchers developed a molecular probe that seeks out these elusive cells and lights them up so they can be identified, tracked and studied not only in cell cultures, but in their native environment: the body.

While other commercial agents are available to flag cancer stem cells, their application is limited, Chan said. Some cannot distinguish between live and dead cells, others can mistakenly bind to wrong targets. The most popular – antibodies that seek out markers on the cell’s surface – are specific to cell types and their large size can prevent them from reaching the small spaces where cancer stem cells tend to lurk. All are designed for use in cell cultures or artificial tumor environments, which lack the complexity of the whole body, Chan said.

In contrast, their new probe, called AlDeSense, is a small molecule that binds to an enzyme related to the property of stemness in cancer cells. The probe becomes activated, emitting a fluorescent signal only when it reacts with the target enzyme – which cancer stem cells produce in high concentrations.

In a series of experiments, the group found that the enzyme seems to be a marker of stemness across many types of cancer, indicating that AlDeSense may be broadly applicable for clinical imaging.

The researchers demonstrated that AlDeSense is compatible with two major cellular techniques – flow cytometry and confocal imaging.

The ability to find and track cancer stem cells in the body, as well as their state of stemness – the signal decreases as the cells differentiate – allowed the researchers to follow cells from injection to tumor as they spread through the bodies of the mice, answering some fundamental questions of how cancer stem cells behave.

According to the researchers nobody knew what happens between injection of cancer stem cells and removal of a tumor prior to this study. There are a lot of models that hypothesize about how cancer stem cells differentiate and grow, but limited experimental data exists.

Through their study, they saw the stemness properties are maintained in the population, even after they metastasize. There’s something about the environment in the body that supports stem cell characteristics. With AlDeSense, now they can profile that environment.

Since they know that the probe only interacts with that one target, they can use the probe to look for a drug that can inhibit this enzyme and verify it in cells and in live animals. The group is currently pursuing a screening for inhibitors or drugs that can kill cancer stem cells by targeting this enzyme.

Tackling a Rare Brain Disease May Also Lead to Alzheimer’s Insights (Todd Dubnicoff)

Alzheimer’s disease and ALS are very complex neurodegenerative disorders, making it very difficult for researchers to tease out the underlying causes let alone find treatments. To make inroads into a better understanding of these incurable diseases, scientists at City of Hope decided to first tackle a related, yet relatively more simple, nervous system disorder called Alexander disease. And this week, the strategy paid off with newly published research in Cell Stem Cell, funded in part by CIRM, describing the development of a patient-derived stem cell model system that could help evaluate novel treatments for all of these neurodegenerative diseases.

AlexanderDisease

An Alexander disease patient's stem cell-derived astrocytes (green) inhibits the growth of precursor cells that, in healthy patients, becomes myelin and speed up the brain's communication network. Credit: Yanhong Shi/City of Hope

The team generated astrocytes, a type of nervous system cell, using induced pluripotent stem cells derived from Alexander disease patients. It was previously known that the mutation in Alexander disease causes the patient’s astrocytes to block another cell type’s ability to produce myelin, the protective covering over neurons that’s critical for communication between nerve cells. But it wasn’t clear how this inhibition happened. In this study, the team found a possible culprit, a protein called CHI3L1 that’s secreted by the patient-derived astrocytes (but not by those from healthy individuals) and interferes with myelin production. So, finding drugs that target CHI3L1 could lead to therapies for Alexander disease.

Dysfunctional astrocytes have also been implicated in ALS and Alzheimer’s disease. So, using this newly developed model system for studying astrocytes could lead to new therapeutic strategies. In a press release, team leader Dr. Yanhong Shi, PhD, provides a specific example how this could work:

“The bulk of ApoE4 resides in astrocytes; ApoE4 is a gene variant known for increasing the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. So, if we understand how astrocytes function, then we can develop therapies to treat Alexander disease and perhaps other diseases that involve astrocytes, such as Alzheimer’s and ALS.”

Promising Advances in Alzheimer’s Research Could Create More Advanced Therapy Options

Screen Shot 2018-08-01 at 12.10.55 PM

Photo Courtesy of NIH

New developments in Alzheimer’s research are bringing us closer to more precise therapies for this debilitating disease.

Alzheimer’s disease, is characterized by the formation of amyloid plaques in the brain, which interfere with the normal communication flow between brain cells, leading to debilitating symptoms like memory loss and impaired decision-making. These plaques are made out of beta-amyloid proteins that stick together.

Over the past few years, researchers from several institutions have been working to develop antibodies that bind to and neutralize the toxic effects of the beta-amyloid. The search for effective antibodies, although promising, has been riddled with setbacks. Knowing this, a team of researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA, decided to approach this issue from a different angle – by conducting experiments to identify a better way of targeting beta-amyloid. Their goal was to develop a more efficient antibody to be used in Alzheimer’s therapy.

Principal investigator Dominic Walsh and team came up with a novel technique to collect beta-amyloid and to prepare it in the laboratory.

walsh-400x520

Dominic Walsh, PH.D.

“Many different efforts are currently underway to find treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, and anti-[beta-amyloid] antibodies are currently the furthest advanced,” says Walsh. “But the question remains: what are the most important forms of [beta-amyloid] to target? Our study points to some interesting answers,” the lead researcher adds, and these answers are now reported in an open access paper published in the journal Nature Communications.”

Beta-amyloid can be found in many forms. At one end of the spectrum, it exists as a single protein, or monomer, which isn’t necessarily toxic.

At the other end, there is the beta-amyloid plaque, in which many beta-amyloid proteins become tangled together. Beta-amyloid plaques are large enough to be observed using a traditional microscope, and they are involved in the development of Alzheimer’s.

In the current study, as well as in a previous one, Walsh and team looked at beta-amyloid structures to identify the ones that are most harmful in the brain.

Typically specialists use synthetic beta-amyloid samples to create a laboratory model of Alzheimer’s disease in the brain. Very few scientists actually collect beta-amyloid from the brains of individuals diagnosed with the disease.

In the current study, Walsh and team focused on finding better a more specific antibody to target the toxic forms of beta-amyloid but not the less harmful forms. To do so, they developed a novel screening test that requires extracting beta-amyloid from brain samples from people with Alzheimer’s. They added these extracts to induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human neurons and observed the ability of the different antibodies to block the toxic effects of the beta-amyloid.

This screening test allowed the team to discover a particular antibody — called “1C22” — that is able to block toxic forms of beta-amyloid more effectively than other antibodies currently being tested in clinical trials.

Walsh explained the implications of their novel screening method:

“We anticipate that this primary screening technique will be useful in the search to identify more potent anti-[beta-amyloid] therapeutics in the future.”

Using laughter to help find a treatment for Alzheimer’s

Alzheimer's

In 1983, when President Ronald Reagan designated an annual National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month fewer than two million Americans had Alzheimer’s. Today, that number is close to 5.5 million and estimates suggest it will rise to 16 million by 2050. There are no treatments. No cure. But around the globe people are working hard to change that.

At CIRM we have invested more than $60 million in 21 projects aimed at developing a deeper understanding of the disease and, we hope, one day developing effective treatments.

d03a2-lauren-miller-premiere-50-50-01

Lauren Miller Rogen

One of those helping lead that fight is our Board member Lauren Miller Rogen. Lauren has a family history of the disease and uses that to fuel her activism not just on our Board but through Hilarity for Charity, the organization she co-founded with her husband, Seth Rogen.

Lauren was recently profiled by the stem cell advocacy group Americans for Cures, talking about the impact the disease has had on her family, her advocacy on behalf of families struggling to cope with the disease and why she feels humor is such a powerful tool to raise awareness and hope in the fight against Alzheimer’s.

It’s a great interview and you can read it here.

Friday Stem Cell Round: Ask the Expert Facebook Live, Old Brain Cells Reveal Insights and Synthetic Development

Stem Cell Photo of the Week: We’re Live on Facebook Live!

Our stem cell photo of the week is a screenshot from yesterday’s Facebook Live event: “Ask the Expert: Stem Cells and Stroke”. It was our first foray into Facebook Live and, dare I say, it was a success with over 150 comments and 4,500 views during the live broadcast.

FacebookLive_AskExperts_Stroke_IMG_1656

Screen shot of yesterday’s Facebook Live event. Panelists included (from top left going clockwise): Sonia Coontz, Kevin McCormack, Gary Steinberg, MD, PhD and Lila Collins, PhD.

Our panel included Dr. Gary Steinberg, MD, PhD, the Chair of Neurosurgery at Stanford University, who talked about promising clinical trial results testing a stem cell-based treatment for stroke. Lila Collins, PhD, a Senior Science Officer here at CIRM, provided a big picture overview of the latest progress in stem cell therapies for stroke. Sonia Coontz, a patient of Dr. Steinberg’s, also joined the live broadcast. She suffered a devastating stroke several years ago and made a remarkable recovery after getting a stem cell therapy. She had an amazing story to tell. And Kevin McCormack, CIRM’s Senior Director of Public Communications, moderated the discussion.

Did you miss the Facebook Live event? Not to worry. You can watch it on-demand on our Facebook Page.

What other disease areas would you like us to discuss? We plan to have these Ask the Expert shows on a regular basis so let us know by commenting here or emailing us at info@cirm.ca.gov!

Brain cells’ energy “factories” may be to blame for age-related disease

Salk Institute researchers published results this week that shed new light on why the brains of older individuals may be more prone to neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. To make this discovery, the team applied a technique they devised back in 2015 which directly converts skin cells into brain cells, aka neurons. The method skips the typical intermediate step of reprogramming the skin cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).

They collected skin samples from people ranging in age from 0 to 89 and generated neurons from each. With these cells in hand, the researchers then examined how increased age affects the neurons’ mitochondria, the structures responsible for producing a cell’s energy needs. Previous studies have shown a connection between faulty mitochondria and age-related disease.

While the age of the skin cells had no bearing on the health of the mitochondria, it was a different story once they were converted into neurons. The mitochondria in neurons derived from older individuals clearly showed signs of deterioration and produced less energy.

Aged-mitochondria-green-in-old-neurons-gray-appear-mostly-as-small-punctate-dots-rather-than-a-large-interconnected-network-300x301

Aged mitochondria (green) in old neurons (gray) appear mostly as small punctate dots rather than a large interconnected network. Credit: Salk Institute.

The researchers think this stark difference in the impact of age on skin cells vs. neurons may occur because neurons have higher energy needs. So, the effects of old age on mitochondria only become apparent in the neurons. In a press release, Salk scientist Jerome Mertens explained the result using a great analogy:

“If you have an old car with a bad engine that sits in your garage every day, it doesn’t matter. But if you’re commuting with that car, the engine becomes a big problem.”

The team is now eager to use this method to examine mitochondrial function in neurons derived from Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s patient skin samples and compared them with skin-derived neurons from similarly-aged, healthy individuals.

The study, funded in part by CIRM, was published in Cell Reports.

“Synthetically” Programming embryo development

One of the most intriguing, most fundamental questions in biology is how an embryo, basically a non-descript ball of cells, turns into a complex animal with eyes, a brain, a heart, etc. A deep understanding of this process will help researchers who aim to rebuild damaged or diseased organs for patients in need.

3-layer_1.16.9

Researchers programmed cells to self-assemble into complex structures such as this one with three differently colored layers. Credit: Wendell Lim/UCSF

A fascinating report published this week describes a system that allows researchers to program cells to self-organize into three-dimensional structures that mimic those seen during early development. The study applied a customizable, synthetic signaling molecule called synNotch developed in the Wendell Lim’s UCSF lab by co-author Kole Roybal, PhD, now an assistant professor of microbiology and immunology at UCSF, and Leonardo Morsut, PhD, now an assistant professor of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine at the University of Southern California.

A UCSF press release by Nick Weiler describes how synNotch was used:

“The researchers engineered cells to respond to specific signals from neighboring cells by producing Velcro-like adhesion molecules called cadherins as well as fluorescent marker proteins. Remarkably, just a few simple forms of collective cell communication were sufficient to cause ensembles of cells to change color and self-organize into multi-layered structures akin to simple organisms or developing tissues.”

Senior author Wendell Lim also explained how this system could overcome the challenges facing those aiming to build organs via 3D bioprinting technologies:

“People talk about 3D-printing organs, but that is really quite different from how biology builds tissues. Imagine if you had to build a human by meticulously placing every cell just where it needs to be and gluing it in place. It’s equally hard to imagine how you would print a complete organ, then make sure it was hooked up properly to the bloodstream and the rest of the body. The beauty of self-organizing systems is that they are autonomous and compactly encoded. You put in one or a few cells, and they grow and organize, taking care of the microscopic details themselves.”

Study was published in Science.

Building a better brain organoid

One of the reasons why it’s so hard to develop treatments for problems in the brain – things like Alzheimer’s, autism and schizophrenia – is that you can’t do an autopsy of a living brain to see what’s going wrong. People tend to object. To get around that, scientists have used stem cells to create models of what’s happening inside the brain. They’re good, but they have their limitations. Now a team at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies has found a way to create a better brain model, and hopefully a faster route to developing new treatments.

For a few years now, scientists have been able to take skin cells from patients with neurodegenerative disorders and turn them into neurons, the kind of brain cell affected by these different diseases. They grow these cells in the lab and turn them into clusters of cells, so-called brain “organoids”, to help us better understand what’s happening inside the brain and even allow us to test medications on them to see if those treatments can help ease some symptoms.

Human-organoid-tissue-green-grafted-into-mouse-tissue.-Neurons-are-labeled-with-red-dye.

Human organoid tissue (green) grafted into mouse tissue. Neurons are labeled with red. Credit: Salk Institute

But those models don’t really capture the complexity of our brains – how could they – and so only offer a glimpse into what’s happening inside our skulls.

Now the team at Salk have developed a way of transplanting these organoids into mouse brains, giving them access to oxygen and nutrients that can help them not only survive longer but also display more of the characteristics found in the human brain.

In a news release, CIRM Grantee and professor at Salk’s Laboratory of Genetics, Rusty Gage said this new approach gives researchers a powerful new tool:

“This work brings us one step closer to a more faithful, functional representation of the human brain and could help us design better therapies for neurological and psychiatric diseases.”

The transplanted human brain organoids showed plenty of signs that they were becoming engrafted in the mouse brain:

  • They had blood vessels form in them and blood flowing through them
  • They formed neurons
  • They formed other brain support cells called astrocytes

They also used a series of imaging techniques to confirm that the neurons in the organoid were not just connecting but also sending signals, in essence, communicating with each other.

Abed AlFattah Mansour, a Salk research associate and the paper’s first author, says this is a big accomplishment.

“We saw infiltration of blood vessels into the organoid and supplying it with blood, which was exciting because it’s perhaps the ticket for organoids’ long-term survival. This indicates that the increased blood supply not only helped the organoid to stay healthy longer, but also enabled it to achieve a level of neurological complexity that will help us better understand brain disease.”

A better understanding of what’s going wrong is a key step in being able to develop new treatments to fix the problem.

The study is published in the journal Nature Biotechnology.

CIRM has a double reason to celebrate this work. Not only is the team leader, Rusty Gage, a CIRM grantee but one of the Salk team, Sarah Fernandes, is a former intern in the CIRM Bridges to Stem Cell Research program.

Gage-Natbiotech-press-release

From left: Sarah Fernandes, Daphne Quang, Stephen Johnston, Sarah Parylak, Rusty Gage, Abed AlFattah Mansour, Hao Li Credit: Salk Institute

Gladstone researchers tame toxic protein that carries increased Alzheimer’s risk

With a clinical trial failure rate of 99% over the past 15 years or so, the path to a cure for Alzheimer’s disease is riddled with disappointment. In many cases, candidate therapies looked very promising in pre-clinical animal studies, only to flop when tested in people. Now, a CIRM-funded Nature Medicine study by researchers at the Gladstone Institutes sheds some light on a source of this discrepancy. And more importantly, the study points to a potential treatment strategy that can remove the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s in human brain cells.

Alzheimers_plaguestangles

Build up of tau protein (blue) and amyloid-beta (yellow) in and around neurons are hallmarks of the damage caused by Alzheimer’s disease. 
Image courtesy of the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health.

For several decades, researchers have known the ApoE gene can influence the risk for an Alzheimer’s diagnosis in individuals 65 years and older. The gene comes in a few flavors with ApoE3 and ApoE4 differing in only one spot in their DNA sequences. Though nearly identical, the resulting ApoE3 and E4 proteins have very different shapes with differing function. In fact, people who inherit two copies of the ApoE4 gene have a twelve times higher risk for Alzheimer’s compared to those with the more common ApoE3.

Gladstone2018_HuangYadong

Yadong Huang

To better understand what’s happening at the cellular level, Yadong Huang, PhD and his team at the Gladstone Institutes obtained skin samples from Alzheimer’s donors carrying two copies of the ApoE4 gene and healthy donors with two copies of ApoE3. The skin cells were reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and then matured into nerve cells, or neurons.

Compared to ApoE3 cells, the researchers observed that the ApoE4 neurons accumulated higher levels of proteins called p-tau and amyloid beta, which are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. Repeating this same experiment in iPSC-derived mouse neurons showed no difference in the production of amyloid beta levels between the ApoE3 and E4 neurons. This result points to the importance of studying human disease in human cells, as first author Chengzhong Wang, PhD, points out in a press release:

“There’s an important species difference in the effect of apoE4 on amyloid beta. Increased amyloid beta production is not seen in mouse neurons and could potentially explain some of the discrepancies between mice and humans regarding drug efficacy. This will be very important information for future drug development.”

Further experiments aimed to answer a long sought-after question: is it the absence of ApoE3 or the presence of ApoE4 that causes the damaging effects on neurons? Using gene-editing techniques, the team removed both ApoE forms from the donor-derived neurons. The resulting cells appeared healthy but when ApoE4 was added back in, Alzheimer’s-associated problems emerged. This finding points to the toxicity of ApoE4 to neurons.

With this new insight in hand, the team examined what would happen if they converted the ApoE4 form into the ApoE3 form. The team had previously designed molecules, they dubbed “structure correctors”, that physically interact with the ApoE4 protein and cause it to take on the shape of the ApoE3 form found in healthy individuals. When these correctors were added to the ApoE4 neurons, it brought back normal function to the cells.

Given that the structure corrector is a chemical compound that works in human brain cells, it’s tantalizing to think about its possible use as a novel Alzheimer’s drug. And you can bet Dr. Huang and his group are eagerly embarking on that new path.

East Coast Company to Sell Research Products Derived from CIRM’s Stem Cell Bank

With patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in hand, any lab scientist can follow recipes that convert these embryonic-like stem cells into specific cell types for studying human disease in a petri dish. iPSCs derived from a small skin sample from a Alzheimer’s patient, for instance, can be specialized into neurons – the kind of cell affected by the disease – to examine what goes wrong in an Alzheimer’s patient’s brain or screen drugs that may alleviate the problems.

exilirneurons

Neurons created from Alzheimer’s disease patient-derived iPSCs.
Image courtesy Elixirgen Scientific

But not every researcher has easy access to a bank of patient-derived iPSCs and it’s not trivial to coax iPSCs to become a particular cell type. The process is also a time sink and many scientists would rather spend that time doing what they’re good at: uncovering new insights into their disease of interest.

Since the discovery of iPSC technology over a decade ago, countless labs have worked out increasingly efficient variations on the original method. In fact, companies that deliver iPSC-derived products have emerged as an attractive option for the time-strapped stem cell researcher.

One of those companies is Elixirgen Scientific of Baltimore, Maryland. Pardon the pun but Elixirgen has turned the process of making various cell types from iPSCs into a science. Here’s how CEO Bumpei Noda described the company’s value to me:

Bumpei-Noda-200

Bumpei Noda

“Our technology directly changes stem cells into the cells that make up most of your body, such as muscle cells or neural cells, in about one week. Considering that existing technology takes multiple weeks or even months to do the same thing, imagine how much more research can get done than before.”

quick-tissue-explanation--768x768

With Elixirgen’s technology, different “cocktails” of ingredients can quickly and efficiently turn iPSCs into many different human cell types. Image courtesy Elixirgen Scientific

Their technology is set to become an even greater resource for researchers based on their announcement yesterday that they’ve signed a licensing agreement to sell human disease cells that were generated from CIRM’s iPSC Repository.

stephen

Stephen Lin

“The CIRM Repository holds the largest publicly accessible collection of human iPSCs in the world and is the result of years of coordinated efforts of many groups to create a leading resource for disease modeling and drug discovery using stem cells,” said Stephen Lin, a CIRM Senior Science Officer who oversees the cell bank.

 

The repository currently contains a collection of 1,600 cell lines derived from patients with diseases that are a source of active research, including autism, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, lung disease, hepatitis C, fatty liver disease, and more (visit our iPSC Repository web page for the complete list).

While this wide variety of patient cells lines certainly played a major role in Elixirgen’s efforts to sign the agreement, Noda also noted that the CIRM Repository “has rich clinical and demographic data and age-matched control cell lines” which is key information to have when interpreting the results of experiments and drug screening.

Lin also points out another advantage to the CIRM cells:

“It’s one of the few collections with a streamlined route to commercialization (i.e. pre-negotiated licenses) that make activities like Elixirgen’s possible. iPSC technology is still under patent and technically cannot be used for drug discovery without those legal safeguards. That’s important because if you do discover a drug using iPSCs without taking care of these licensing agreements, your discovery could be owned by that original intellectual property holder.”

At CIRM, we’re laser-focused on accelerating stem cell treatments to patients with unmet medical needs. That’s why we’re excited that Elixirgen Scientific has licensed access to the our iPSC repository. We’re confident their service will help researchers work more efficiently and, in turn, accelerate the pace of new discoveries.

Harnessing DNA as a programmable instruction kit for stem cell function

DNA is the fundamental molecule to all living things. The genetic sequences embedded in its double-helical structure contain the instructions for producing proteins, the building blocks of our cells. When our cells divide, DNA readily unzips into two strands and makes a copy of itself for each new daughter cell. In a Nature Communications report this week, researchers at Northwestern University describe how they have harnessed DNA’s elegant design, which evolved over a billion years ago, to engineer a programmable set of on/off instructions to mimic the dynamic interactions that cells encounter in the body. This nano-sized toolkit could provide a means to better understand stem cell behavior and to develop regenerative therapies to treat a wide range of disorders.

Stupp

Instructing cells with programmable DNA-protein hybrids: switching bioactivity on and off Image: Stupp lab/Northwestern U.

While cells are what make up the tissues and organs of our bodies, it’s a bit more complicated than that. Cells also secrete proteins and molecules that form a scaffold between cells called the extracellular matrix. Though it was once thought to be merely structural, it’s clear that the matrix also plays a key role in regulating cell function. It provides a means to position multiple cell signaling molecules in just the right spot at the right time to stimulate a particular cell behavior as well as interactions between cells. This physical connection between the matrix, molecules and cells called a “niche” plays an important role for stem cell function.

Since studying cells in the laboratory involves growing them on plastic petri dishes, researchers have devised many methods for mimicking the niche to get a more accurate picture of how cells response to signals in the body. The tricky part has been to capture three main characteristics of the extracellular matrix all in one experiment; that is, the ability to add and then reverse a signal, to precisely position cell signals and to combine signals to manipulate cell function. That’s where the Northwestern team and its DNA toolkit come into the picture.

They first immobilized a single strand of DNA onto the surface of a material where cells are grown. Then they added a hybrid molecule – they call it “P-DNA” – made up of a particular signaling protein attached to a single strand of DNA that pairs with the immobilized DNA. Once those DNA strands zip together, that tethers the signaling protein to the material where the cells encounter it, effectively “switching on” that protein signal. Adding an excess of single-stranded DNA that doesn’t contain the attached protein, pushes out the P-DNA which can be washed away thereby switching off the protein signal. Then the P-DNA can be added back to restart the signal once again.

Because the DNA sequences can be easily synthesized in the lab, it allows the researchers to program many different instructions to the cells. For instance, combinations of different protein signals can be turned on simultaneously and the length of the DNA strands can precisely control the positioning of cell-protein interactions. The researchers used this system to show that spinal cord neural stem cells, which naturally clump together in neurospheres when grown in a dish, can be instructed to spread out on the dish’s surface and begin specializing into mature brain cells. But when that signal is turned off, the cells ball up together again into the neurospheres.

Team lead Samuel Stupp looks to this reversible, on-demand control of cell activity as means to develop patient specific therapies in the future:

stupp-samuel

Samuel Stupp

“People would love to have cell therapies that utilize stem cells derived from their own bodies to regenerate tissue. In principle, this will eventually be possible, but one needs procedures that are effective at expanding and differentiating cells in order to do so. Our technology does that,” he said in a university press release.