Stem cell stories that caught our eye: good fat vs. bad fat, the black box of cell reprogramming and Parkinson’s

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

One day a pill might turn bad fat into good fat. For a few years now several research teams have linked white fat to the bad health effects of fat and brown fat to more positive metabolism and to being leaner. Now, a team at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute has used stem cells in the laboratory as a screening tool to look for drugs that could cause the bad fat to turn into the good fat.

Brown fat derived from stem cells. Image courtesy of Harvard

Brown fat derived from stem cells. Image courtesy of Harvard

They have found two molecules that can prevent fat stem cells from becoming mature white fat and instead direct them to become brown fat. But those two molecules used as pills would likely have too many unintended side effects to become a treatment that would likely need to be taken long-term. So, despite some overblown headlines about a “pill to replace a treadmill,” don’t count on it anytime soon.

That treadmill line came from a story in the Harvard Gazette, but to the school’s credit they did follow-up with the needed caveats:

“The path from these findings to a safe and effective medication may not be easy, and the findings will have to be replicated by other research groups, as well as refined, before they could lead to a clinical treatment.”

Opening up the black box of reprogramming cells. Researchers around the world have been turning adult cells into embryonic-like stem cells ever since Shinya Yamanaka’s Nobel-prize winning work showing it was possible more than six years ago. But no one really knew how it works. And that lack of understanding has made it quite difficult to improve on the poor efficiency and mixed-results of the process.

This led 30 senior scientists at eight institutions around the world to launch a project in 2010 to create an extremely detailed map of all the switching on and off of genes over time during the weeks it takes to reprogram adult cells to become “pluripotent” stem cells. The effort, called Project Grandiose, reported its results this week in a series of three papers in the journal Nature Communications. The name comes in part from the massive size of the data sets involved. Files could not be sent electronically. The teams were shipping memory storage devices around the world by courier. The leader of the project, Andras Nagy of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto described the project in a review of the field in Nature:

“It was the first high-resolution analysis of change in cell state over time. I’m not shy about saying grandiose.”

That journal review provides the best history of reprogramming that I have read and it is written on a level that a lay science hobbyist could understand. It gives a good explanation for one of the surprise findings from Project Grandiose that got a little over-played in some coverage. That was discovery of a new type of pluripotent stem cell called F Class, not referring to Mercedes car lines, but rather the fact that the cell clusters in a lab dish look fuzzy. The process that creates them in the lab seems to be more efficient than traditional reprogramming.

The critical output of the international project is more practical. Researchers around the world now have myriad new ways to think about improving the production of reprogrammed stem cells. Ken Zaret of the University of Pennsylvania, and a long time toiler in the field told the author of the Nature review this work opens up options for more reliable sources of cells to be used in human medicine:

“The motivation of my research is to treat patients. Anything that helps push iPS cells into the clinic excites me.”

Stem cells from inside the nose treat Parkinson’s in rats. A type of stem cell found in tissue that in humans would be thrown out after sinus surgery was retrieved from rats and then injected into the parts of their brains that do not function properly in Parkinson’s disease (PD). After 12 weeks the cells had migrated to where they were needed and matured into the type of nerve cell needed to cure PD and improved the function of the animals.

The cells, called inferior turbinate stem cells, could be a way to use a patient’s own stem cells as therapy for PD and avoid issues of immune rejection of donor cells, which may or may not be an issue in the brain, but this would remove a layer of risk. The work by a team at the University of Bielefeld and Dresden University of Technology in Germany was published in the journal Stem Cells Translational Medicine and the Houston Chronicle picked up the journal’s press release.

World Stem Cell Summit: The environment stem cells find themselves in after transplant really matters

On Friday’s closing day of the 2014 World Stem Cell Summit a panel of three researchers working on neurodegenerative diseases drove home the importance of paying attention to the environment that surrounds stem cells after transplant.

world-stem-cells-summit-2014

CIRM grantee Evan Snyder from the Sanford-Burnham Institute noted that most of the neurologic diseases people are looking at are conditions associated with aging and the cellular makeup of the brain changes as we get older, adding that most of the diseases result from chronic states that have existed over many years. He contrasted this against mouse models of the disease, which usually involve artificially recreating the disease and treating shortly after the injury happens.

“In stem cell therapies there is a dialogue between the transplanted cells and the recipient. The host influences the fate of the stem cells.”

He noted that the patients we will be treating have generally had long-term degeneration and asked if we might be able to develop drugs that effect the environment where the stem cells will be placed so that it mimics more closely the environment found in the animal model in the acute phase, that is right after injury.

One aspect of the environment in the brain in most patients with neurodegeneration is chronic inflammation. Another CIRM grantee on the panel, Jeanne Loring of the Scripps Research Institute, discussed a project her team hopes will take advantage of the inflammation that occurs in Alzheimer’s disease. They are loading nerve stem cells with an enzyme that can degrade the plaque that accumulates in nerves in the disease. Because stem cells home to inflammation, they hypothesize that the stem cells will be drawn to deliver their cargo to the nerves with the worst plaque.

The third panelist, Erzi Kokovay of the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, described the changes in the brain as we age in a bit more detail. She described infiltration of cells called microglia that researchers will need to take into account when they plan to transplant stem cells in the brain.

While on the surface this all may sound like another road block to getting to the stem cell cures we all want, the presentation actually made me optimistic that we are starting to learn enough about the field that we are more likely to get it right when we start to treat some of these devastating brain diseases.

Don Gibbons

At World Stem Cell Summit improvements in the precision with which we can edit our genes grabs spotlight

Just a day and a half into this year’s World Stem Cell Summit in San Antonio and there have been numerous highlights. But a pair of sessions on gene editing grabbed the attention of many of the scientists at the meeting. One of the renown leaders in the field, Harvard’s George Church wowed the scientists, but I fear the heavy dose of scientific detail may have overwhelmed many of the patient advocates that make the attendee mix at this meeting special.

George Church speaking recently [Credit: PopTech.org]

George Church speaking recently [Credit: PopTech.org]

In 2013, Church first published results using a new gene-editing tool he helped perfect called CRISPR, and almost immediately it became the most talked-about tool for advancing stem cell research. As powerful as stem cells may be by themselves, in many situations, they become even more powerful—especially if you use them to deliver a gene that corrects an error in a patient’s cells. Before 2013 we had a few ways to edit genes in living cells and all were modestly effective at making the desired change and relatively specific in making only a few unwanted changes, called “off target” edits.

In some uses, particularly when cells are being modified in the lab for specific and small targets, these other editing techniques are probably OK. This is what several CIRM-funded teams (links) are doing with diseases like sickle cell anemia and HIV, where you can target blood-forming stem cells and even giving a small percentage the proper gene edit may be sufficient to cure the disease. But with something like muscular dystrophy where the gene editing would be required throughout the body and have to be done in the patient not in the lab, you need to improve the efficiency and precision.

CRISPR/Cas9 [Credit: University of California, San Francisco]

CRISPR/Cas9 [Credit: University of California, San Francisco]

After that first publication CRISPR was viewed as a home run in efficiency, taking the number of cells with the gene correction from a few percent to 50 percent or more. But it still had off-target effects. Yet only a year after the technology was introduced, a few teams developed so-called “next generation” CRISPR that comes close to perfect precision, causing an unintended edit in just one in a billion cells, by Church’s estimate.

I have never seen the full name of CRISPR spelled out in a scientific presentation, and after a visit to Wikipedia I know why. Here it is: Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats. Basically, Church took advantage of something that occurs naturally in many bacteria. Just as we are susceptible to viruses, bacteria have their version known as phages. When those parasites integrate their DNA into the bacteria’s genes, part of the bacterial DNA forms CRISPRs that can partner with a protein called Cas to cut the phage DNA and keep the phage from hurting the host bacteria.

In a research setting, creating that “nick” in the DNA is the first step in harnessing CRISPR to insert a desired gene. So, that extreme precision in finding spots on our DNA where we want to create an opening for inserting a new gene became this valuable research tool. It can create a nick as precise as a single nucleotide base, the building blocks of our DNA.

Church and two additional speakers gave detailed descriptions about how the technology has improved and how it is being used to model disease today and is expected to be used to treat disease in the near future. An exciting future is in store.

Don Gibbons

At World Stem Cell Summit: Why results in trials repairing hearts are so uneven

Just as no two people are the same, neither are the cells in their bone marrow, the most common source of stem cells in clinical trials trying to repair damage after a heart attack. Doris Taylor of the Texas Heart Institute in Houston, which is just a couple hours drive from the site of this year’s World Stem Cell Summit in San Antonio, gave a key note address this morning that offered some good reasons for the variable and often disappointing results in those trials, as well as some ways to improve on those results.

THI's Dr. Doris Taylor

THI’s Dr. Doris Taylor

The cells given in a transplant derived from the patient’s own bone marrow contain just a few percent stem cells and a mix of adult cells, but for both the stem and adult cells the mix is highly variable. Taylor said that in essence we are giving each patient a different drug. She discussed a series of early clinical trials in which cell samples from each patient were banked at the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute. There they could do genetic and other analysis on the cells and compare that data with how each individual patient faired.

In looking at the few patients in each trial that did better on any one of three measures of improved heart function, they were indeed able to find certain markers that predicted better outcome. In particular they looked at “triple responders,” those who improved in all three measures of heart function. They found there were both certain types of adult cells and certain types of stem cells that seemed to result in improved heart health.

They also found that two of the strongest predictors were gender and age. Women generally develop degenerative diseases of aging like heart disease at an older age than men and since many consider aging to be a failure of our adult stem cells, it would make sense that women have healthier stem cells.

Taylor went on to discuss ways to use this knowledge to improve therapy outcomes. One way would be to select for the more potent cells identified in the NHLBI analysis. She mentioned a couple trials that did show better outcomes using cells derived from heart tissue. One of those is work that CIRM funds at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles.

Another option is replace the whole heart and she closed with a review of what is probably her best-known work, trying to just that. In rats and pigs, she has taken donor hearts and used soap-like solutions to wash away the living cells so that all that is left behind are the proteins and sugars that make of the matrix between cells. She then repopulates the scaffolds that still have the outlines of the chambers of the heart and the blood vessels that feed them, with cells from the recipient animal. She has achieved partially functional organs but not fully functional ones. She—along with other teams around the world—is working on the remaining hurdles to get a heart suitable for transplant.

Don Gibbons

Stem cell stories that caught our eye: organ replacement, ovarian cancer and repairing damaged hearts.

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

Numbers on organ shortage and review of lab replacements.
Vox, the four-month-old web site, is rapidly becoming a credible news source with more than five million page views so far. With a reputation for explaining the facts behind the news, it was nice to see they tackled the organ shortage and how researchers are using stem cells to try to solve it.

organ shortage.0After providing data on the incredible need, the author addressed several key advances, as well as remaining hurdles, to using stem cells to build replacement organs in the lab. She notes that an important step to growing an organ is being able to grow all the various types of cells that make up a complex organ.

“Each specialized type of cell in your body needs certain chemical clues from its environment in order to thrive and multiply. And even a simple-seeming body part, like a urethra, requires more than one cell type, arranged in certain ways relative to one another.”

In addition to a chart with data on organ donation and need, the article provides a link to a fun video on growing a rat lung in the lab. The author closes with the fact that the greatest need is for kidneys and a discussion of how tough they are to make because of the complex mix of tissues needed.

An advance in building kidneys also made the journals this week, with a press release from Cellular Dynamics describing how their lab grown cells succeeded in coating the inside of blood vessels in a scaffold for a rodent kidney.

Stem cell factors heal damaged hearts. The American Heart Association met in Chicago this week and as always the week of their fall enclave generates several news stories. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News wrote up a study from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York that suggested how your own stem cells might be recruited to repair damage after a heart attack.

The New York team used a form of gene therapy that introduced the genes for “stem cell factors” that they believe could summon a type of stem cell that some have suggested can repair heart muscle. Although, whether those cells, called c-Kit positive heart stem cells, are actually the cause of the repair remains a subject of debate. They did show that their treatment improved heart function and decreased heart muscle death in the rodent model they were using.

Stem cells improve survival of skin grafts.
With so many soldiers returning from deployments needing reconstructive surgery, several teams at our armed services medical institutes are trying to solve the problem of the soldiers’ immune systems rejecting large skin grafts from donors. One team reported a potentially major advance in the Journal Stem Cells Translational Medicine and the web site benzinga picked up the journal’s press release.

Working in mice the team got the best skin graft survival in animals that received two types of stem cells to induce immune tolerance to the graft. The mice received fat-derived stem cells from humans and an infusion of a small number of their own bone marrow stem cells. The grafts showed no sign of rejection after 200 days, a very long time in a mouse’s life. In the press release, the editor of the journal, Anthony Atala, suggested the results could have broad implications for the field.

“The implications of this research are broad. If these findings are duplicated in additional models and in human trials, there is potential to apply this strategy to many areas of transplantation.”

Leukemia drug may also work in ovarian cancer. The antibody named for CIRM in recognition of our funding of its discovery, cirmtuzumab, which is already in clinical trials in humans for leukemia, may also be effective in one of the most stubborn tumors, ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer cells

Ovarian cancer cells

The University of California, San Diego, team led by Thomas Kipps published a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week showing that in mice the antibody kept transplanted human ovarian cancer cells in check. The tumor that is characterized by rapid spread did not metastasize at all. HealthCanal picked up the university’s press release explaining how the new drug works. You can read about the CIRM-funded clinical trial in leukemia in our fact sheet.

Versatile fingernail stem cells.
The stem cells that regrow our nails are prodigious little critters forcing us to constantly cut or file. But it turns out they are also versatile. They can stimulate nail growth but also growth of skin around the nail.

But if our nails get injured they become single minded and only make nail cells. A team at the University of Southern California has discovered that at the time of injury a particular protein signal gets turned on directing the stem cells to focus on the nails. So, the team is now looking for other signaling proteins that might direct these versatile cells to make other tissues making them potential tools for healing amputations. ScienceDaily picked up the university’s press release.

Don Gibbons

Stem cell stories that caught our eye: gene editing tools, lung repair in COPD and big brains

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

Correcting the genetic error in sickle-cell disease might be as simple as editing the text.

Correcting the genetic error in sickle-cell disease might be as simple as editing the text [Credit: Nature News].

Review of the many ways to edit defective genes. Nature’s news section did a nice review of the many ways blood-forming stem cells can be genetically altered to correct diseases caused by a single mutation. If you have been following the recently booming field of gene therapy, you may have a hard time keeping all the items in the gene editing toolbox straight. The Nature author provides a rundown on the leading contenders—viral vectors, zinc fingers, TALENs and CRISPRs. Early in the piece she describes why researchers are so excited by the field.

“Although most existing treatments for genetic diseases typically only target symptoms, genetic manipulation or ‘gene therapy’ goes after the cause itself.”

Much of the article talks about work by CIRM grantees. It describes work by Don Kohn at the University of California, Los Angeles, on vectors and zinc fingers, as well as work by Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte at the Salk Institute using TALENS and CRISPRs. We explain Kohn’s work treating sickle cell disease in our Fact Sheet.

Getting lungs to repair themselves. A research team at Jackson Labs in Maine has isolated a stem cell in lungs that appears to be able to repair damage left behind by severe infections. They hope to learn enough about how those stem cells work to enlist them to repair damage in diseases like Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

They published the work in Nature and ScienceDaily picked up the lab’s press release. It quotes the lead researcher, Wa Xian on the hope they see down the road for the 12 million people in the U.S. with COPD:

“These patients have few therapeutic options today. We hope that our research could lead to new ways to help them.”

Making middle-man cells more valuable. The University of Wisconsin lab of Jamie Thomson, where human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) were first isolated, has found a way to make some of the offspring of those stem cells more valuable.

We have often written that for therapy, the desired cell to start with is not an ESC or even the end desired adult tissue, but rather a middleman cell called a progenitor. But those cells often don’t renew, or replicate themselves, very well in the lab. Ideally researchers would like to have a steady supply of progenitor cells that could be pushed to mature further only when needed. The Thomson lab found that by manipulating a few genes they could arrest the development of progenitors so they constantly renew themselves. ScienceNewsline picked up the press release from the University’s Morgridge Institute that houses the Thomson lab.

Link found to human’s big brains. A CIRM-funded team at the University of California, San Francisco, isolated a protein that seems to be responsible for fostering the large brain size in humans compared with other animals. Human brain stem cells need the protein, dubbed PDGFD, to reproduce.

The team found that the protein acts on parts of the brain that have changed during mammalian evolution. It is not active at all in mice brains, for example. So, if someone accuses you of being a smart aleck just tell them you can’t help it, it’s your PDGFD. HealthCanal ran the university’s press release, which provides a lot more detail of how the protein actually helps give us big heads.

Don Gibbons

Stem cell stories that caught our eye: heart repair, epilepsy and comparing cloned and reprogrammed cells

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

Reminding broken hearts how to mend them selves.
After years of tracking down the right genetic buttons a team at the Salk Institute in La Jolla has taught a mammal to do what zebra fish do naturally, repair a severely damaged heart. While all our cells have the genetic code for building whole organs those genes seem to be switched off in all higher animals, but active in some more primitive species like zebra fish and salamanders.

New cells (red) repairing injury in a zebra fish heart.

New cells (red) repairing injury in a zebra fish heart.

Starting a decade ago the researchers measured the gene activity during heart repair in the fish. They found many genes that had their on-off status change during repair. They then looked to see which of those genes had been preserved during evolution to mammal species. They found four genes that were turned off during repair in the fish but were turned on in the mice they were using.

When, with CIRM funding, they inserted genetic signals to turn off those genes in the mice, they saw significant repair of the damaged heart. There are many steps between this advance and getting human hearts to repair them selves—notably finding a way to introduce the genetic signals without using the virus used in this study. HealthCanal picked up the institute’s press release.

Cloned stem cells pretty much like reprogrammed stem cells. In the early days of stem cell research there was a great deal of excitement about the possibility of creating stem cells that genetically match a patient by a process commonly called cloning. This process of taking the genetic storehouse of a cell, the nucleus, and inserting it into a donor egg had been relatively easy in mice. But it turned out quite difficult in humans and was only accomplished last year.

During the years of failed attempts at this process known as nuclear transfer in humans an alternative came into the field. The Nobel prize-winning discovery that you can reprogram any adult cell to act like an embryonic stem cell gave us a new way to create personalized stem cells that genetically match a patient. But ever since that 2008 advance, the research community has fretted over whether those new stem cells called iPS cells really match embryonic stem cells. The iPS cells came from older cells that had lived through many opportunities for mutation and the genetic factors used to reprogram them added further opportunities for mutation.

Researchers at the New York Stem Cell Foundation’s in house lab have now compared the two types of cells with several layers of genetic analysis. They found the same level of mutation in the iPS cells and the cells from nuclear transfer lending some reassurance to the use of iPS cells going forward. HealthCanal ran the foundation’s press release.

A more efficient way to make cloned stem cells. Even though a team in Oregon overcame the obstacles to creating stem cells by nuclear transfer last year, and the feat has been repeated by the New York team above and others, it remains terribly inefficient. So, several groups are working on better ways to make these potentially valuable cells.

A former colleague now at Children’s Hospital, Boston wrote a nice explanation of how researchers are going about making these cloned cells easier in the hospital’s blog, Vector.

Stem cells reduced seizures.
The seizures endured by people with many forms of epilepsy originate from genetic defects in their nerves. So, a team at McClean Hospital outside of Boston implanted healthy nerves grown from embryonic stem cells in mice with genetically linked seizures. Half the mice no longer had seizures and the other half had their seizure frequency reduced.

The type of nerves transplanted are called interneurons, which are known to be the nerves that reduce firing of signals. In epilepsy nerve signals are hyperactive. The team is now working on methods to mature the stem cells into purer populations of just the desired interneurons. ClinicalSpace picked up the hospital’s press release.

Don Gibbons

Ideas and Energy Reveal Surprises at Stem Cell Showcase

Janssen, the company within the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson responsible for much of its research and development, has a branch in the Bay Area called J Labs. It seeks to foster innovation in all sectors of biomedical research. One piece of that effort brings together innovators for monthly gatherings to exchange ideas and network. The events have an upbeat sense of energy so it was exciting when they invited CIRM to put together an all-day session dubbed: CIRM Showcase: Accelerating Stem Cell Treatments to Patients.

logo

The resulting showcase yesterday had that energy. But for someone who knows the CIRM portfolio of projects backward and forward, I thought, there were a few pleasant surprises. Perhaps the most exciting news came from Linda Marban, CEO of Capricor, the company CIRM is funding to complete a clinical trial in patients with weakened hearts after a heart attack. She disclosed that the company’s next target is the heart remodeling that is the cause of death in most boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. She said some early data would be released at the American Heart Association meeting in Chicago in two weeks.

Another bit of news—most exciting for science wonks—came from the biotech company Sangamo that CIRM funds to develop genetically modified blood stem cells as therapy for two diseases, HIV and beta thalassemia. The firm has developed a molecular scissors called a zinc finger nuclease that can splice the DNA that makes our genes. I knew the technique was pretty precise, but Curt Herberts from the company said they had perfected it to where it could get down to a single base pair—a single link in the chain that makes up our DNA. This greatly reduces the chances for any unintended effects of the genetic manipulation.

Two advances I learned about were in using iPS type stem cells as models for disease and for discovery of traditional drugs to treat those diseases. Ashkan Javaherian, from Steve Finkbeiner’s lab at the Gladstone Institutes, described some results with the robotic microscope they have developed that lets them screen hundreds of molecules on neurons grown from iPS cells reprogrammed from patients with specific diseases. Looking just at compounds already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ones that could be put in the clinic quickly, they found four that reduced the degradation normally seen in neurons grown from patients with Huntington’s disease.

Similarly, Joseph Wu of Stanford described his work with cells from families with various genetic heart disorders. In addition to getting individualized information from the patient-specific cells, he said they could now take it one step further and sequence the entire DNA of the cells for just $500, yielding the chance to find out exactly what mutations were causing the disease. He said it was a big step towards truly personalized medicine and to developing therapies for various racial groups that respond differently to drugs.

The day began with our President and CEO C. Randall Mills detailing his plans for a nimbler, more responsive CIRM he has dubbed CIRM 2.0. This crowd seemed thrilled with his plan for an open call for applications so that they could come in with a request when they are ready instead of forcing them into a premature application for funding because the window might not open for another year or two.

One bit of trivia drove home how difficult the entire process of moving innovative therapies into the clinic can be. Paul Laikind, CEO of ViaCyte, the company CIRM has provided more than $50 million to develop a diabetes therapy, noted the size of the application they sent to the FDA: 8,500 pages. Kind of says it all.

Don Gibbons

Stem Cell Stories that Caught our Eye: Perspective on “Walking” Patient, Blood Stem Cells have a Helper and Three Clinical Trials at One Campus

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

Some perspective on nasal stem cells and ”walking” patient. PZ Meyers writing on ScienceBlogs did a good job of putting some perspective into the hype in many news outlets about the spinal cord injury patient who was treated with nasal stem cells. He starts out admitting he was “incredulous” that there was anything to the study, but after a thorough reading of the actual journal article he was convinced that there was some real, though modest gain in function for the patient. His conclusion:

“Sad to say, the improvements in the man’s motor and sensory ability are more limited and more realistic than most of the accounts would have you think.”

The research team actually reported on three patients. One got barely noticeable improvement; the patient in the news reports regained about 25 percent of function—which is indisputably a major gain in this population—and the third was somewhere in between.

shutterstock_132771389

Meyer speculated about a reason for the improvements that was left out of most press reports. In addition to the stem cell harvested from the patients’ own nasal passages injected on either side of the injury the team also harvested nerve fibers from the patients legs and transplanted them across the site of the injury. They hoped the nerve strands would act as a bridge for the stem cells to grow and close the gap. It is also possible that being nerve cells they could provide the right cell-to-cell signals directing the nasal stem cells to become nerves. Meyers closed with an appropriate summary:

“I think there’s good reason to be optimistic and see some hope for an effective treatment for serious spinal cord injuries, but right now it has to be a realistic hope — progress has been made. A cure does not exist.”

Body’s own helper for blood stem cells found. In a case of the children ordering around the parents, a team at the Stowers Institute in Kansas City found that one of the progeny of blood-forming stem cells in the bone marrow can control the activity of the stem cells. In particular, they were looking at megacarocytes, the relatively rare bone marrow cells that normally produce the blood platelets you need for clotting a wound.

Blood stem cells are the most common stem cell therapy today, but one plagued by our limited ability to control their growth. Knowing this involvement of their offspring gives researcher a new avenue to search for ways to grow the much needed parent stem cells. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News wrote up the findings.

(Yes, I may be the only person in World Series-obsessed San Francisco writing something positive about Kansas City this week.)

Three clinical trails launched at just one campus. We have written individually about three clinical trials that began in the last month at the University of California, San Diego. Now, the university has written a good wrap up of the three trials that got posted to ScienceDaily.

Collectively, the three trials show the breadth of stem cell research starting to reach patients. One trial, for diabetes, uses cells derived from embryonic stem cells encased in a pouch to protect them from immune rejection. Another uses cells derived from fetal nerve stem cells to treat spinal cord injury. And the third involves a drug that targets the cancer stem cells that are believed to cause much of the spread of the disease and resistance to chemotherapy in cancer patients.

CIRM is funding two of the three trials and supported much of the basic science that led to the third. We expect to be funding 10 projects with approved clinical trials by the end of the year. The field is moving.

Don Gibbons

Stem cell stories that caught our eye: Some good news got a little overplayed on blindness and Alzheimer’s

Here are some stem cell stories that caught our eye this past week. Some are groundbreaking science, others are of personal interest to us, and still others are just fun.

Stories on blindness show too much wide-eyed wonder. While our field got some very good news this week when Advanced Cell Technologies (ACT) published data on its first 18 patients treated for two blinding diseases, many of the news stories were a little too positive. The San Diego Union Tribune ran the story from Associated Press writer Maria Cheng who produced an appropriately measured piece. She led with the main point of this early-phase study—the cells implanted seem to be safe—and discussed “improved vision” in half the patients. She did not imply their sight came back to normal. Her third paragraph had a quote from a leading voice in the field Chris Mason of University College London:

“It’s a wonderful first step but it doesn’t prove that (stem cells) work.”

The ACT team implanted a type of cell called RPE cells made from embryonic stem cells. Those cells are damaged in the two forms of blindness tested in this trial, Stargardt’s macular dystrophy and age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in the elderly. Some of the patients have been followed for three years after the cell transplants, which provides the best evidence to date that cells derived from embryonic stem cells can be safe. And some of the patients regained useful levels of vision, which with this small study you still have to consider other possible reasons for the improvement, but it is certainly a positive sign.

CIRM funds a team using a different approach to replacing the RPE cells in these patients and they expect to begin a clinical trial late this year

Stem cells create stronger bone with nanoparticles.   Getting a person’s own stem cells to repair bad breaks in their bones certainly seems more humane than hacking out a piece of healthy bone from some place else on their body and moving it to the damaged area. But our own stem cells often can’t mend anything more than minor breaks. So, a team from Keele University and the University of Nottingham in the U.K. laced magnetic nanoparticles with growth factors that stimulate stem cell growth and used external magnets to hold the particles at the site of injury after they were injected.

It worked nicely in laboratory models as reported in the journal Stem Cells Translational Medicine, and reported on the web site benzinga. Now comes the hard step of proving it is safe to test in humans

Stem cells might end chronic shortage of blood platelets. Blood platelets—a staple of cancer therapy because they get depleted by chemotherapy and radiation—too often are in short supply. They can only set on the shelf for five days after a donation. If we could generate them from stem cells, they could be made on demand, but you’d have to make many different versions to match various peoples’ blood type. The latter has been a bit of a moot point since no one has been able to make clinical grade platelets from stem cells.

plateletsA paper published today by Advanced Cell Technologies may have solved the platelet production hurdle and the immune matching all at once. (ACT is having a good week.) They produced platelets in large quantities from reprogrammed iPS type stem cells without using any of the ingredients that make many iPS cells unusable for human therapy. And before they made the platelets, they deleted the gene in the stem cells responsible for the bulk of immune rejection. So, they may have created a so-called “universal” donor.

They published their method in Stem Cell Reports and Reuters picked up their press release. Let’s see if the claims hold up.

Alzheimer’s in a dish—for the second time. My old colleagues at Harvard got a little more credit than they deserved this week. Numerous outlets, including the Boston Globe, picked up a piece by The New York Times’ Gina Kolata crediting them with creating a model of Alzheimer’s in a lab dish for the first time. This was actually done by CIRM-grantee Lawrence Goldstein at the University of California, San Diego, a couple years ago.

But there were some significant differences in what the teams did do. Goldstein’s lab created iPS type stem cells from skin samples of patients who had a genetic form of the disease. They matured those into nerve cells and did see increased secretion of the two proteins, tau and amyloid-beta, found in the nerves of Alzheimer’s patients. But they did not see those proteins turn into the plaques and tangles thought to wreak havoc in the disease. The Harvard team did, which they attributed, in part, to growing the cells in a 3-dimensional gel that let the nerves grow more like they would normally.

The Harvard team, however, started with embryonic stem cells, matured them into nerves, and then artificially introduced the Alzheimer’s-associated gene. They have already begun using the model system to screen existing drugs for candidates that might be able to clear or prevent the plaques and tangles. But they introduced the gene in such a way the nerve cells over express the disease gene, so it is not certain the model will accurately predict successful therapies in patients.

Don Gibbons